RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01683
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He needs benefits.
In support of this application, the applicant submits a copy of
his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 19 Jun 62, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
The applicant was involved in a number of minor disciplinary
infractions from Oct 63 to Aug 64 for which he received various
administrative and disciplinary actions.
On 3 Dec 64, his commander notified him that he was recommending
his discharge under the provisions of AFR 39-17, Unfitness. His
specific reasons were the applicants frequent involvement of a
discreditable nature with military authorities and his
established pattern of financial irresponsibility.
On 21 Dec 64, the discharge authority approved the applicants
discharge and an Undesirable Discharge Certificate was issued.
On 22 Jan 65, the applicant was discharged. He served 1 year,
11 months and 23 days on active duty.
Pursuant to the Boards request, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report,
which is at Exhibit C. On 11 Aug 11, a copy of the FBI report
and a request for post-service information was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 30 days, as of this date,
no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful
consideration of the available evidence, we found no indication
that the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper or
contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect
at the time, or that the actions taken against the applicant were
based on factors other than his own misconduct. In addition, in
view of the content of the FBI Identification Record, we are not
persuaded that the characterization of the applicants discharge
warrants an upgrade to honorable on the basis of clemency.
Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions
that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we
conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on his
request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 7 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Apr 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report, dated 29 Jul 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 11 Aug 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03525
The applicants commander approved the recommendation of the discharge board on 26 Nov 80. The applicant received a UOTHC discharge on 8 Dec 80 after serving 6 years and 14 days on active duty. In response to our request, applicant provided post-service information, which is attached at Exhibit A.
On 12 Apr 78, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied an appeal from the applicant to upgrade his discharge. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates in his response that the Air Force evaluation contained an error,...
As of this date, this office has received no response. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that his separation code should remain the same since he did in fact, voluntarily request discharge for the good of the service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03197
On 22 Oct 64, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for unsuitability. The evaluation officer conducted an interview with the applicant, reviewed his records and comments by his commander, and recommended his discharge from the Air Force with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00313
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00313 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Prior to his termination from the Air Force on 22 Dec 78, his service record was outstanding. While we found no evidence of an error or injustice with regards to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00134
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI provided a copy of an Investigative Report pertaining to the applicant (Exhibit C). On 24 Mar 11, the applicant was provided a copy of the Investigative Report, along with a request for documentation concerning his activities since leaving military service (Exhibit D). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02819
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02819 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 13 Feb 08.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00478
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00478 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 Dec 92, the applicant’s commander notified him that she was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for Misconduct - Pattern of Minor Disciplinary...
f. Vacation of nonjudicial punishment, dated 9 Jul 81, for failure to go to guardmount at the time prescribed. The complete report is at Exhibit F. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT”S RESPONSE TO FBI REPORT: A copy of the FBI report was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Oct 01 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 14 Sep 01.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02843
On 9 Aug 82, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing to report for duty at the appointed place and time. d. On 15 Sep 82, he received an LOC for failing to adequately support his dependent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...